AI Visibility Tools with Free Trials (2026): 17 Options Compared
AI visibility tools with a free trial in 2026 include GrackerAI (7 days), Otterly.AI (7 days, no card), Profound (7 days), Scrunch (7 days, no card), SE Visible (10 days), Searchable (14 days), Nightwatch (14 days, no card) and LLM Pulse (14 days). AthenaHQ and Semrush offer free plans, and Peec AI, Rankscale and Writesonic offer trials without publishing the length. Every term below was checked on the vendor’s own page.
The AI visibility platforms worth trialing track citations per engine (not one blended score), name which competitor is cited instead of you, and show which source the AI pulled from. Use the trial to test those three things on your own prompts.
51% of B2B software buyers now start category research inside an AI chatbot like ChatGPT, Perplexity, or Claude more often than Google, based on a March 2026 survey of 1,076 B2B decision-makers (G2, “The Answer Economy: G2’s 2026 AI Search Insight Report,” retrieved 2026-09-19). When someone asks “best AI visibility tool with a free trial,” the model returns a short list built from sources it trusts, not ten blue links.
Rank Tracking vs. Citation Tracking: Two Different Metrics
Rank tracking | Citation tracking | |
|---|---|---|
Answers | Where does my URL rank for this keyword? | Did the AI mention my brand in its answer, and where in the answer? |
Tied to | A single search engine's results page | What an LLM chose to say, out of everything it could say |
Unit measured | Position (1st, 2nd, 3rd...) | Presence, sentiment, and citation source |
Built for | Google-era search | Conversational, answer-first search |
The two numbers move independently. A page can sit at position one on Google and never get pulled into a ChatGPT answer, because the AI search engine is drawing its answer from a Reddit thread or a competitor’s comparison page instead.
Tools built as SEO suites first, with AI tracking bolted on later, tend to report one blended “AI visibility score” across every engine. That single number hides which specific engine, which specific competitor, and which specific prompt is the actual problem, which is the exact gap a Marketing Data Analyst runs into when asked to prove AI search ROI with a number no one can act on.
What an AI Visibility Platform Needs to Do
A citation, unlike a rank, breaks down into more than one signal: whether a brand was mentioned at all (presence), how early in the answer it appeared (prominence), whether the mention was positive or negative (sentiment), and whether the AI actually linked to the brand’s site as a source (citation) rather than just recalling the name from general training data. A platform worth trialing needs to report on more than a single blended number:
-
Track each of those signals per engine, not blended into one score. A brand can be well cited on Perplexity and invisible on ChatGPT; a single average hides that difference and points a team at the wrong fix.
-
Show the exact prompts where a named competitor is cited and the brand is not. A directional “we’re behind” is not actionable. A specific prompt, with the competitor named, is.
-
Attribute each citation to its source. Knowing a brand was mentioned is step one. Knowing which domain the model actually pulled from to make that claim is what turns the data into a fix, since the source itself is often the thing worth improving or replicating.
-
Break share of voice down by topic, not just by brand. A brand can dominate one subject in its category and lose badly in an adjacent one; a single share-of-voice number across every prompt hides which topic is actually the problem.
-
Surface emerging competitors before they’re established, since a rival that starts appearing in AI answers this month is a much cheaper problem to address now than after it has months of accumulated citations.
AI Visibility Tool Free Trials Compared
| Tool | Free trial or free plan | Length | What is included | Card required |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GrackerAI | Free trial on Individual and Team | 7 days | The self-serve plan you pick: Individual (100 prompts weekly, ChatGPT, Google AI Mode, Google AI Overviews) or Team (200 prompts daily, 4 engines) | Yes, cancel anytime before it ends |
| Otterly.AI | Free trial | 7 days | 50 search prompts | No |
| Profound | Free trial | 7 days | 50 recommended prompts run daily on ChatGPT, Gemini and Google AI Overviews; 1 language, 1 region; prompts not customizable | Not published |
| Scrunch | Free trial of the Starter plan | 7 days | Starter plan features | No |
| Goodie AI | Free trial on Core | 7 days | Core plan | Not published |
| Rankability | Free trial | 7 days | Not published | Yes |
| AiClicks | Free trial | 3 days | Not published | Yes |
| SE Visible | Free trial | 10 days | Not published | Not published |
| Searchable | Free trial on Pro and Scale | 14 days | Pro or Scale plan | Not published |
| Nightwatch | Free trial | 14 days | Not published | No |
| LLM Pulse | Free trial on weekly plans | 14 days | Weekly-tracking plans | Not published |
| Peec AI | “Start free trial” on pricing page | Not published | Not published | Not published |
| Rankscale | “Try Pro for Free” | Not published | Pro plan | Not published |
| Writesonic | Free trial on Starter, Basic and Growth | Not published | Plan features; Enterprise is demo only | No |
| AthenaHQ | Free plan | Ongoing | 5 engines on the free tier | Not published |
| Semrush | Free plan, plus a 7-day trial on paid plans | 7 days (trial) | AI Visibility features listed on the free plan; prompt count not published | No for the free plan |
| Conductor | Free trial on Essentials | Not published | Essentials plan | Not published |
How we checked: trial terms come from each vendor’s pricing page or help center. GrackerAI, Otterly.AI, Profound, Scrunch, SE Visible, Searchable, Nightwatch, Peec AI, Rankscale, Writesonic and Semrush were read on 2026-11-06. Goodie AI, Rankability, AiClicks, LLM Pulse, AthenaHQ and Conductor come from vendor pages read 5 Nov 2026 for our AI visibility tool pricing comparison. “Not published” means the vendor’s page does not say. Trial terms change often, so check before you sign up.
Disclosure: GrackerAI publishes this guide. The same columns apply to every row.
Entry Price and Engines for Each Trial
| Tool | Entry price | Engines on the entry plan |
|---|---|---|
| GrackerAI | $99/mo ($79 billed yearly) | 3: ChatGPT, Google AI Mode, Google AI Overviews (4 on Team, all 10 on Enterprise) |
| Otterly.AI | $29/mo | 4: ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity, Copilot (AI Mode, Gemini, Claude as add-ons) |
| Profound | Enterprise custom | 3 on the trial, up to 9 on Enterprise |
| Scrunch | $250/mo billed yearly ($300 monthly) | ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Mode, AI Overviews, Meta |
| SE Visible | $89/mo ($71 billed yearly) | ChatGPT, AI Overviews, AI Mode, Gemini, Copilot |
| Searchable | $125/mo ($100 billed yearly) | 3: ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity (others as add-ons) |
| Nightwatch | EUR 79/mo | ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Mode, AI Overviews |
| Peec AI | $95/mo | 3 you choose from ChatGPT, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Copilot, Gemini, Naver AI |
| Rankscale | $17/mo billed yearly (Essentials); Pro $84/mo (list $99) | 17+ on every plan |
| Writesonic | $79/mo billed annually | 3: ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI Overviews |
1. GrackerAI
Free trial: 7 days on both self-serve plans (Individual and Team). A credit card is required to start it, and you can cancel anytime before it ends.
Starting price: $99/month Individual ($79 billed yearly); Team $499/month ($399 billed yearly); Enterprise custom
Best for: B2B SaaS teams that need to trace a citation back to its source and then fix the gap
GrackerAI is the AEO & GEO platform for B2B SaaS. It measures visibility per engine across every engine your plan tracks (3 on Individual, 4 on Team, all 10 on Enterprise), so a strong Perplexity result cannot hide a weak ChatGPT one.
A brand cited often but always in the last third of an answer is in a weaker position than one cited less often but near the top. GrackerAI calls this Position Distribution, ranked from Hero (first third of the answer) to Tail (last third). The methodology is documented at gracker.ai/docs/using-gracker/understanding-your-scores/scoring-basics.
Competitor monitoring shows share of voice against every competitor you track, the exact prompts where a rival wins and you are missing, and the new brands the models start naming alongside you. LLM citations shows which sources shape the answers in your category, where you appear in them, and where you are missing.
When a prompt shows no citation, Visibility Diagnosis shows how every AI engine answers that prompt (1 run a month on Individual, 5 on Team). Plans also include LLM-optimized articles (3 a month on Individual, 10 on Team, unlimited on Enterprise). Enterprise adds vertical-tuned analysis models, a vertical prompt library that is deepest for cybersecurity, multi-product monitoring under one brand, and SSO/SAML with API access.
Limitations: Individual tracks 3 engines (ChatGPT, Google AI Mode, Google AI Overviews) and checks prompts weekly. Daily tracking and Perplexity and Copilot start on Team. Gemini and Claude are Enterprise-only, and Enterprise has no self-serve trial.
2. Otterly.AI
Free trial: 7 days with 50 search prompts, no credit card required (Otterly help center)
Starting price: $29/month (Lite, 15 prompts)
Engines tracked: ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity and Microsoft Copilot on every plan; Google AI Mode, Gemini and Claude are paid add-ons
Best for: Teams that want the lowest published entry price
Otterly.AI publishes its pricing and tracks prompts daily on every self-serve plan. It describes its share of voice as “the percentage of citations you own versus competitors.”
Limitations: 15 tracked prompts on Lite, and Lite cannot add prompts. AI Mode, Gemini and Claude cost extra. No content generation, so gaps still need a separate writing process.
3. Profound
Free trial: 7 days, with 50 recommended prompts run daily on ChatGPT, Gemini and Google AI Overviews, in 1 language and 1 region
Starting price: Enterprise is custom; no paid self-serve brand plan is listed
Engines tracked: up to 9 on Enterprise
Best for: Enterprise teams that want to see the product before a sales conversation
The trial runs on Profound’s recommended prompts, which you cannot customize. Use it to judge the interface and reporting, then ask for an Enterprise pilot on your own prompts.
Limitations: The trial does not test your own prompt set, and pricing after the trial is through sales.
4. Scrunch
Free trial: 7 days on the Starter plan, no credit card required
Starting price: $250/month billed yearly, or $300/month billed monthly
Engines tracked: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Mode and AI Overviews, and Meta
Best for: Marketing teams that want persona-based prompts and a large prompt allowance
Starter includes 350 custom prompts, 1,000 industry prompts, 3 personas and 3 user licenses. Scrunch benchmarks competitors by persona, topic and region.
Limitations: One of the higher entry prices on this list.
5. SE Visible
Free trial: 10 days
Starting price: $89/month Basic ($71 billed yearly), 75 prompts
Engines tracked: ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, Gemini and Copilot, updated daily
Best for: Teams already using SE Ranking for keyword tracking and backlinks
SE Visible is SE Ranking’s AI visibility product. Metrics open into the AI response they came from.
Limitations: API models are not included on Basic or Core.
6. Searchable
Free trial: 14 days on Pro and Scale
Starting price: $125/month Pro ($100 billed yearly), 100 prompts per model
Engines tracked: ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews and Perplexity included; Google AI Mode, Gemini, Claude, Copilot and others are paid add-ons
Best for: Teams that want unlimited seats and a longer trial
Limitations: Pro covers one project. Add-on engine prices are not shown on the pricing page.
7. Nightwatch
Free trial: 14 days, no credit card required
Starting price: EUR 79/month Starter, 50 AI prompts tracked daily
Engines tracked: ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Mode and AI Overviews; Claude on Enterprise
Best for: Teams that lead with rank tracking and want AI visibility next to it
Limitations: Prices are in euros.
8. Peec AI
Free trial: a “Start free trial” button on the pricing page; length and card terms are not published there
Starting price: $95/month (Starter, 50 prompts)
Engines tracked: 3 active models you choose from ChatGPT, Google AI Mode, Google AI Overviews, Copilot, Gemini and Naver AI; more on Enterprise
Best for: Teams that want to pick their own engine mix, with daily tracking
Limitations: Self-serve plans track 3 models at a time. Perplexity and Claude are on Enterprise.
9. Rankscale
Free trial: a “Try Pro for Free” option; length and card terms are not published on the pricing page
Starting price: $17/month Essentials (billed yearly); Pro shows $84/month (list price $99)
Engines tracked: 17+ on every plan
Best for: Teams that want broad engine coverage without engine add-ons
Rankscale uses credits rather than a fixed prompt count, so model your usage before you pick a tier.
Limitations: The trial evaluates Pro, not the Essentials entry price.
10. Writesonic
Free trial: offered on Starter, Basic and Growth, with no credit card required; length not published
Starting price: $79/month Starter, billed annually (50 prompts)
Engines tracked: ChatGPT, Gemini and Google AI Overviews on self-serve plans; 9 platforms on Enterprise
Best for: Teams that want AI visibility tracking bundled with content generation
Limitations: Self-serve plans track 3 platforms. Perplexity, Copilot and AI Mode are on Enterprise, which is demo only.
Writesonic is not the only platform that pairs tracking with content. Our roundup of the best AI visibility tools for automated content creation compares the platforms built around that combination.
Trials We Removed
Earlier versions of this guide listed trial details we could not confirm on vendor pages on 2026-11-06, so we removed them: a 7-day Peec AI trial without a card, a 7-day Rankscale trial with a limited credit allowance, a 7-day Writesonic trial, and a 14-day SE Ranking trial on its Core plan. SE Visible’s own pricing page now states a 10-day trial.
How to Run a 7-Day Proof of Concept
A 7-day proof of concept (POC) tells you whether a tool will work on your own prompts before you pay. Run the same plan in every tool you trial, ideally in the same week.
Before day 1: prepare
- Write 20 to 30 buyer prompts: category (“best X for Y”), comparison (“A vs B”) and problem prompts. Use Search Console queries and sales call notes.
- Name 3 to 5 competitors.
- Write down 3 questions the POC must answer, such as “Which engine are we weakest on?”
Day 1: set up
- Load your prompts and competitors. Note how long setup takes and whether the tool suggests prompts for your category.
- Confirm which engines the trial covers. Profound’s trial, for example, runs fixed prompts on 3 engines.
Days 2 to 3: check the data
- Open per-engine results, not just the summary score.
- Ask 3 tracked prompts by hand in ChatGPT and Perplexity. Compare with what the tool reports for the same day.
Days 4 to 5: check the analysis
- Find prompts where a competitor is cited and you are not.
- Check whether the tool shows the source domain or page behind each citation.
- Check how share of voice is calculated. Our AI share of voice guide explains the formula and variants.
Day 6: test the next step
- Pick one lost prompt. Does the tool tell you what to fix (a brief, the winning page, a source to get into) or only repeat the data?
- Try export: CSV, API or MCP.
Day 7: score and decide
- Score each tool on the same criteria. Our GEO and AEO platform buying guide has a 10-criteria weighted scorecard and an RFP checklist.
- Compare the trial tier with the plan you would buy. Trial features can differ from the cheaper plan.
- Cancel any trial you will not keep before it converts, especially where a card was required.
How to Choose
Need standardized reporting to prove ROI to leadership: Prioritize per-engine breakdowns over a single blended score, tracked against a defined set of GEO metrics and KPIs.
Managing a category with named competitors: Look for competitor share of voice on the same prompt set, plus the prompts where a rival wins.
Budget-constrained, evaluating for the first time: Otterly.AI ($29/mo) has the lowest published entry price and a 7-day trial with no card.
Want the longest trial: Searchable, Nightwatch and LLM Pulse list 14 days. SE Visible lists 10.
Want a free plan rather than a trial: AthenaHQ and Semrush list free plans.
In B2B SaaS or cybersecurity: GrackerAI pairs tracking with vertical prompt libraries and content built for technical B2B buyers.
Marketing team of five or fewer, no dedicated analyst: see the best AI search optimization platforms for small marketing teams for a shortlist scored on automation and budget fit.
For wider shortlists, see our top 15 LLM tracking tools and best AEO tools for brands. Want a baseline before any trial? Run the free AI visibility checker.
Whichever platform you pick, a trial only converts if the evaluation is designed to convert. See Behavioral Economics in B2B SaaS Trials for how vendors structure trials, and how to reduce churn and increase paid conversion using SaaS onboarding for what drives activation.
FAQ
Which AI visibility tools offer a free trial?
As of 6 Nov 2026: GrackerAI (7 days, card required), Otterly.AI (7 days, no card), Profound (7 days), Scrunch (7 days on Starter, no card), Goodie AI (7 days on Core), Rankability (7 days, card required), AiClicks (3 days, card required), SE Visible (10 days), Searchable (14 days on Pro and Scale), Nightwatch (14 days, no card) and LLM Pulse (14 days on weekly plans). Peec AI, Rankscale, Writesonic and Conductor offer trials without publishing the length on their pricing pages.
Which AI visibility tools have a free plan?
AthenaHQ lists a free tier covering 5 engines, and Semrush lists a free plan that includes AI Visibility features without a published prompt count. GrackerAI and Ahrefs also offer free AI visibility checkers for a one-off baseline.
Do AI visibility free trials require a credit card?
It varies. Otterly.AI, Scrunch, Nightwatch and Writesonic say no card is needed. GrackerAI, Rankability and AiClicks require a card. Many vendors do not publish card terms, so check the signup flow.
How do you run a proof of concept for an AI visibility tool?
Prepare 20 to 30 buyer prompts and 3 to 5 competitors. On day 1 load them, on days 2 and 3 check per-engine results against manual checks in ChatGPT and Perplexity, on days 4 and 5 check competitor gaps and cited sources, on day 6 test whether the tool tells you what to fix, and on day 7 score each tool on the same weighted criteria.
What’s the difference between rank tracking and citation tracking?
Rank tracking measures where a URL sits in a traditional search engine’s results for a keyword. Citation tracking measures whether an AI engine mentions a brand in a generated answer, where in that answer, and which source it cites. The two can move independently of each other.
Can a free trial actually validate a platform before committing budget?
Yes. Running a trial against a brand’s own prompts and named competitors is a direct way to benchmark current AI share of voice before an annual commitment, since the underlying facts (which engines cite the brand, which competitor wins instead) are checkable within the trial period rather than requiring a long sales cycle to find out.
Why does per-engine data matter more than one blended score?
Because engines behave differently. A brand might be well cited on Perplexity and nearly invisible on ChatGPT. Those are two different problems needing two different fixes, and a blended average hides which one is actually happening.
What does citation source attribution actually show?
Which specific domain, article, or discussion thread an AI model pulled from to make a claim about a brand or a competitor. Without it, “we weren’t cited on this prompt” has no next step. With it, the next step is “here is the exact page winning this citation, and here is what it covers that ours doesn’t.”
How often should a team check AI visibility?
Weekly is generally enough to catch a trend before it becomes a quarter-over-quarter problem. Most tools on this list refresh daily, and GrackerAI checks prompts weekly on Individual, daily on Team and hourly on Enterprise, so nobody has to re-run prompts by hand.
Does citation tracking cover different underlying model versions of the same engine?
It depends on the tool. Some capture what the consumer app returns to users, and some call model APIs, which can return different answers and citations. Ask each vendor which method it uses and spot-check a few prompts by hand during the trial.
Compare tools head to head
Shortlisting? These pages put GrackerAI next to each tool, with prices read from the vendor’s own site:
- GrackerAI vs Profound · Profound alternatives
- GrackerAI vs Peec AI · Peec AI alternatives
- GrackerAI vs Otterly.AI · Otterly.AI alternatives
- GrackerAI vs AthenaHQ · AthenaHQ alternatives
- GrackerAI vs Promptwatch · Promptwatch alternatives
- GrackerAI vs Semrush · Semrush alternatives
- GrackerAI vs Ahrefs Brand Radar · Ahrefs Brand Radar alternatives
- GrackerAI vs Scrunch AI · Scrunch AI alternatives
- AI visibility tool pricing compared
- All GrackerAI comparisons