10 Best Tools to Check if ChatGPT Mentions Your Brand 2026
ChatGPT processes over 2.5 billion prompts a day. Four in ten B2B security buyers now start their research inside ChatGPT, Perplexity, or Claude instead of Google. When a CISO asks "best SIEM for mid-market" or "top zero trust vendors," the model doesn't return ten blue links. It returns a shortlist, with sources behind it.
Being mentioned isn't the same as being trusted, and being trusted isn't the same as being cited correctly. This guide compares the tools built to track that gap, ranked by depth and accuracy for security vendors specifically, plus what each one actually shows you once you look past the marketing page
Quick Comparison
Tool | Starting Price | Standout Feature | Platforms Tracked | Content Generation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
$99/mo | Diagnoses why a prompt is lost, then writes the fix | 3/5/10 Engines as per plan | ✓ (plus rewrites of existing pages) | |
Otterly AI | $29/mo | Lowest entry price, GEO URL audits | 4 platforms | ✗ |
Geoptie | $41/mo | Flat pricing across 6 platforms at every tier | 6 platforms | ✗ |
Searchable | $50/mo | Site audits bundled with mention tracking | 1 (Starter) | ✓ |
Peec AI | $95/mo | Pick your own 3 models from a list of 7 | 3 (custom) | ✗ |
Profound | $99/mo | Prompt volume data, SOC2 compliance | 1 (Starter) | ✓ (limited) |
Semrush AI Visibility | $99/mo | Prompt research inside an existing SEO workflow | 1 domain, 25 prompts | ✗ |
WorkDuo | $33/project/mo | Citation intelligence, sentiment themes | 7 platforms | ✗ (data layer only) |
Scrunch AI | $25/mo | Misinformation and brand-safety detection | 8 platforms | ✗ |
1. GrackerAI
Price: $99/month (Starter), $499/month (Growth), custom (Enterprise)
Best for: Cybersecurity and B2B SaaS vendors who need to know not just whether they're cited, but why they aren't and what to publish next
Most tools in this list stop at reporting: here's your mention count, here's your sentiment, here's a chart. GrackerAI was built specifically for security vendors, and it adds two layers most competitors skip entirely.
Visibility Diagnosis. Point it at any prompt where the brand isn't showing up. It searches the vendor's own site for a page that should be targeting that prompt, scores how well that page actually matches, and pulls the exact competitor pages AI engines cited for that prompt over the last 30 days.
Then it branches: if no page exists, it writes a content brief with the angle, outline, and the specific claims that earn citations. If a page exists but a competitor wins the citation anyway, it returns a gap report showing what's missing and how stale the page is next to the one that's winning.

Citation intelligence, not just mention counts. Inside the dashboard's Citation tool, you can see the specific sources an LLM pulled from to cite a competitor instead of you, on a prompt-by-prompt basis. Top Citing Domains shows which sources AI engines lean on most across your whole category. New and Lost Citation Sources flag when a source starts or stops being cited, which is often the earliest warning that your visibility is about to shift. There's even a dedicated Reddit view that rolls citations up by subreddit, since security buyers lean on community threads more than almost any other AI answer engines cite from.
Position Distribution is another one worth knowing about: it's not enough to appear in an answer if you're buried at the end. Gracker buckets where your brand lands in a response, from Hero (first third) to Tail (last third), because earlier placement is worth more even at identical mention frequency, a distinction almost none of the tools below report on.
ChatGPT tracking includes
Per-engine citation frequency, sentiment, and average citation position (not one blended score)
Competitive citation gap analysis, including a Discovered view that catches new competitors entering AI answers before they become a real problem
Prompts grounded in real buyer behavior via Google Search Console and Bing Webmaster integration, plus a mining layer that pulls actual questions from People Also Ask and forum discussions
AEO Audit scoring every page for citability (structure, evidence, freshness, schema, AI-crawler access) alongside conventional technical health
Limitations: Multi-region tracking requires Enterprise. Team seats limited to 1-5 depending on plan.
2. Otterly AI
Price: $29/month (Lite), $189/month (Standard), $489/month (Premium)
Best for: Budget-conscious startups getting started with AI visibility
Otterly offers the lowest entry price in the market. The Lite plan tracks ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, and Gemini with GEO audit tools that analyze how well your pages are optimized for AI citation.
ChatGPT tracking includes:
GEO URL audits (1,000-10,000/month)
Multi-country support (50+ countries)
Unlimited team members
Limitations: Only 15 prompts at Lite tier. No content generation. Google AI Mode requires a paid add-on.
3. Geoptie
Price: $41/month (Starter), $83/month (Professional), $166/month (Enterprise)
Best for: Agencies managing multiple brands
Geoptie tracks 6 AI platforms at every tier: ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Copilot, and Grok. The flat pricing structure makes it accessible their top tier ($166/month) costs less than most competitors' mid-tier.
ChatGPT tracking includes:
Unlimited GEO audit reports
Multi-brand tracking (2-50 brands depending on plan)
6 free GEO tools for evaluation
Limitations: Only 15 prompts at Starter. No content generation features.
4. Searchable
Price: $50/month (Starter), $125/month (Professional), $400/month (Scale)
Best for: E-commerce brands needing site audits alongside ChatGPT tracking
Searchable combines ChatGPT monitoring with technical site audits. The platform checks whether AI crawlers can access your content and identifies technical issues preventing citations.
ChatGPT tracking includes:
Brand visibility monitoring
Site audits (50-1,000/month)
AI shopping data (Scale tier)
30% annual discount available
Limitations: Starter tracks ChatGPT only. Additional AI platforms require higher tiers.
5. Peec AI
Price: $95/month (Starter), $245/month (Pro), $495/month (Advanced)
Best for: Marketers who want to choose which AI models to track
Peec AI lets you pick 3 AI models from a list of 7, rather than getting a fixed set. If ChatGPT is your only priority, you can focus your tracking there without paying for platforms you don't care about.
ChatGPT tracking includes:
Flexible model selection
Unlimited team seats
Looker Studio integration (Advanced)
Agency pricing available
Limitations: No content generation. Additional AI models cost $35-$165/month each.
6. Profound AI
Price: $99/month (Starter), $399/month (Growth), Custom (Enterprise)
Best for: Enterprise teams needing SOC2 compliance
Profound offers prompt volume data showing how often specific queries are asked on ChatGPT similar to keyword volume in traditional SEO. Their enterprise security (SOC2, SSO) is legitimate if compliance matters.
ChatGPT tracking includes:
Brand visibility scores
Agent-based content workflows
GA4 integration
Limitations: Starter tracks ChatGPT only. Content generation capped at 3 articles/month on Growth. Price jumps significantly between tiers.
7. Gauge
Price: $99/month (Starter), $599/month (Growth)
Best for: Brands monitoring ChatGPT ads and sponsored content
Gauge tracks ChatGPT advertising placements a feature most tools don't offer. As ChatGPT rolls out more sponsored content, this visibility becomes valuable for e-commerce and DTC brands.
ChatGPT tracking includes:
Organic mention monitoring
Sponsored content tracking
Ask Gauge AI research agent
High prompt volume (600 at Growth)
Limitations: Starter tracks ChatGPT only. Steep price jump to Growth tier ($99 to $599).
8. Writesonic
Price: $99/month (Starter), $249/month (Basic), $499/month (Growth)
Best for: Teams wanting AI writing plus ChatGPT tracking in one platform
Writesonic bundles ChatGPT visibility tracking with AI content generation, site audits, and the Chatsonic AI assistant. If you're already paying for multiple tools, the consolidation makes sense.
ChatGPT tracking includes:
Brand mention monitoring
Site audits (10-50/month)
AI content generation
SOC2 + HIPAA compliance
Limitations: Starter tracks ChatGPT only. 8+ AI platforms require Growth tier at $499/month.
9. AthenaHQ
Price: $295/month (Starter), $499/month (higher tiers)
Best for: E-commerce brands using Shopify who need revenue attribution
Founded by ex-Google Search engineers, AthenaHQ connects ChatGPT citations to actual revenue through Shopify integration. Their ACE engine predicts citation probability rather than just tracking current state.
ChatGPT tracking includes:
Revenue attribution (Shopify)
Citation probability predictions
Action Center with content agents
Multi-region tracking
Limitations: Premium pricing. Credit-based model can be unpredictable. Best features locked to Enterprise.
10. Scrunch AI
Price: $250/month
Best for: Enterprise brands concerned about AI misinformation
Scrunch focuses on brand safety detecting when ChatGPT says incorrect things about your brand. Their Agent Experience Platform (AXP) creates machine-readable versions of your brand specifically for AI crawlers.
ChatGPT tracking includes:
Misinformation detection
Brand safety monitoring
8 AI platform coverage
GA4 integration for bot traffic
Limitations: Highest entry price ($300/month). No free trial. Credit system can consume prompts faster than expected.
Why "Mention Frequency" Is the Wrong Metric to Optimize Alone
Most of the tools above will happily tell you a number: X% of ChatGPT answers mentioned your brand last month. That number is close to useless on its own, for three reasons
**Frequency without position hides the real story-**Two brands can both get mentioned in 40% of relevant answers, and one is buried in the last sentence while the other opens the response. Position affects how much weight a mention actually carries with the person reading it, which is why tracking Hero-to-Tail placement (not just presence) belongs in any serious evaluation.
Sentiment isn't binary- A brand can be mentioned accurately but framed as "budget" or "legacy" when it wants to be framed as "enterprise-ready." Tracking whether AI-generated descriptions of your brand are drifting, and toward what, matters as much as whether you show up at all. This is where narrative tracking earns its place next to sentiment, not as a nice-to-have layer on top of it.
A mention with no traceable source is a dead end- If you don't know which domain, article, or Reddit thread the model pulled from to make a claim about you or a competitor, you can't act on it. Citation intelligence, being able to trace an answer back to its actual source, is what turns "we're invisible on this prompt" into "here's the exact page winning this citation and here's what it has that ours doesn't."
How to Choose the Right Tool
If you're a solo marketer or small team on a budget: Otterly AI or Geoptie give you real tracking at the lowest entry price. Neither generates content, so budget separately for whoever writes the fixes once gaps show up
If you're an agency managing multiple client brands: Geoptie's flat multi-tier pricing and WorkDuo's project-based structure are both built for this. If your clients are in cybersecurity specifically, GrackerAI's multi-brand tracking keeps each client's dashboard, competitors, and prompts fully separate rather than blended into one number, with a workspace-level rollup for the agency owner.
If compliance is a procurement requirement: Profound (SOC2) is the straightforward choice at this price point.
If you want tracking and content production in one place, not two vendors: GrackerAI and Searchable are the two on this list that go past monitoring into generating (or rewriting) the actual content needed to close a citation gap. Searchable pairs it with site audits; Gracker pairs it with prompt-level diagnosis of why a specific page is losing.
If you're specifically in cybersecurity, IAM, or adjacent security SaaS: This is the one place generic tools show their limits. A GEO platform that treats "best CRM" and "best SIEM" prompts the same way will miss the technical accuracy, compliance context, and buyer language security researchers actually search for. GrackerAI's models are built only for this category, which is a real tradeoff: better fit if you're in it, wrong tool if you're not.
What ChatGPT Tracking Actually Shows You
Most ChatGPT monitoring tools provide:
Brand mentions - Whether ChatGPT recommends your brand when users ask relevant questions
Competitor analysis - How often competitors get cited instead of you
Sentiment tracking - Whether mentions are positive, negative, or neutral
Query-level data - Which specific prompts trigger (or don't trigger) your brand
Trend analysis - How your visibility changes over time
The tools that go beyond monitoring also help you improve visibility through content recommendations or generation.
Why ChatGPT Mentions Matter
ChatGPT drives 78% of all AI referral traffic and converts at 14.2% compared to Google's 2.8%. When prospects ask ChatGPT for recommendations in your category, being mentioned directly influences purchase decisions.
The challenge: 93% of ChatGPT sessions end without a website click. Users get their answer and act on it. If your brand isn't in that answer, there's no second chance to appear.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check if ChatGPT mentions my brand for free?
You can manually ask ChatGPT questions your customers would ask and see if your brand appears. For systematic tracking across multiple queries and over time, you'll need a dedicated tool. Some offer free tiers or audits GrackerAI has a free Seed plan with 50 pages.
How often should I check my ChatGPT visibility?
Weekly monitoring catches trends before they become problems. Most tools provide automated reports so you don't have to check manually.
Can I improve my ChatGPT mentions?
Yes. Create content that ChatGPT can cite as authoritative comparison pages, comprehensive guides, FAQ content, and original research. Tools with content generation features help create this systematically.
Does ChatGPT tracking also cover GPT-4 and GPT-4o?
Yes. Most tools track ChatGPT responses regardless of the underlying model version. Some enterprise tools like Profound specifically call out GPT-5.2 tracking.
What's the difference between ChatGPT tracking and GEO?
ChatGPT tracking monitors one platform. GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) optimizes for multiple AI platforms including ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews. Most tools in this list offer multi-platform tracking, not just ChatGPT.