SIEM evaluations are decided by ingest economics, detection content and migration pain, and buyers now put all three to an assistant first. GrackerAI shows you how the engines answer, which vendors they name, and what it would take to be one of them.
7-day free trial. Cancel anytime before it ends.
Ingest pricing is the defining anxiety of this category, and it is exactly the kind of question buyers take to an assistant rather than a sales team. Whoever published a comprehensible answer gets to frame it.
LLM Citations shows which domains the engines read when they explain SIEM pricing, so you can see whether a competitor's calculator or a consultancy blog is framing your economics.
Diagnosis takes any prompt about switching platforms, finds the page on your site that should have answered it, and scores it against the pages the engines actually cited.
CVE, CWE, ATT&CK, CAPEC and NIST references on your pages are resolved against the body that issued them, and an active-exploit claim is checked against CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
Identifiers are resolved before a draft is written, and anything the model produced that is not in that resolved set is stripped out before the page publishes.
New vulnerabilities and security news are swept on a schedule, scored for exploitability and for how closely they touch your products, and the survivors become monitored prompts automatically.
Cost and migration prompts pull cited sources heavily, which makes Perplexity the engine to watch most closely here.
| Prompt category | Example query | Where it lands most |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | What does SIEM ingest actually cost at 2TB a day | PerplexityChatGPT |
| Migration | Moving detection content off a legacy SIEM | ClaudePerplexity |
| Detection | SIEM platforms with strong out-of-the-box ATT&CK coverage | ClaudePerplexity |
| Sources | Which SIEM parses Kubernetes audit logs properly | ClaudeChatGPT |
| Consolidation | Replacing SIEM and SOAR with one platform | ChatGPTPerplexity |
Buyers model cost with an assistant before they talk to anyone. If the engines answer from a competitor's calculator, the framing is set against you before the first call.
Explore Content Engine →Detection content is the switching barrier. The vendor whose migration documentation the engines can actually read is the one that appears when someone asks how hard it would be.
Explore Diagnosis →Detection coverage claims lean on ATT&CK technique ids. Verification resolves each one against MITRE, so a coverage page is checkable rather than merely confident.
Explore Security Verification →A missing parser ends evaluations silently. Explicit, current source-coverage pages give the engines something concrete to cite instead of an assumption.
Explore LLM Citations →| Stage | What you use |
|---|---|
| Diagnose Find where you are missing today | Prompt Research AI Visibility Monitoring AI Visibility Score |
| Explain Understand why a prompt goes to someone else | Visibility Diagnosis LLM Citations Competitor Monitoring |
| Fix Turn findings into published pages | Technical AEO Audit Recommendation Engine Content Engine |
| Ship Get it live and keep it moving | Tasks WordPress Publishing AI Search Analytics |
Questions B2B SaaS teams ask before getting started
The same all 10 AI engines it tracks for every vertical: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode, Google AI Overviews, Gemini, Microsoft Copilot, DeepSeek, Brave Leo, Grok and Claude. Coverage is by plan — 3 engines on Starter, 4 on Scale and all 10 on Enterprise.
Monitors are weighted toward ingest cost and migration prompts, which is where SIEM decisions are actually made, and ATT&CK technique references are resolved against MITRE before any coverage claim publishes.
Monitoring starts returning answers on the first run, so you can see where you stand immediately. Movement in citations follows publishing, which depends on how fast you ship the fixes the audit and diagnosis hand you.
No. Classic SEO governs ranking; AEO and GEO govern whether a model quotes you. The technical audit overlaps with an SEO audit in places, but the citation work sits alongside what you already do rather than replacing it.
60 seconds. 7-day free trial, cancel anytime.
Start your 7-day free trial and get your AI Visibility Score in about a minute. See exactly where you stand, where competitors are beating you, and the ranked fixes to get into the answer. Cancel anytime before the trial ends.
7-day free trial. Cancel anytime before it ends. Trusted by 500+ B2B SaaS teams.
